FEATURE ๐๐ฎ๐ด๐๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
Feb 5, 2026 - 1 minute read
Frengie Gandiongco-Botoy SEPS-Planning and Research SDO-Agusan del Norte ๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต๐๐ณ๐๐น ๐ฃ๐๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ Reynaldo Antonio Laguda's work on decentralizing Philippine basic education stands out as a thoughtful push toward making the system more responsive and equitable. As a forme...
Frengie Gandiongco-Botoy
SEPS-Planning and Research
SDO-Agusan del Norte
๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต๐๐ณ๐๐น ๐ฃ๐๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ
Reynaldo Antonio Laguda's work on decentralizing Philippine basic education stands out as a thoughtful push toward making the system more responsive and equitable.
As a former DepEd undersecretary and now a key voice in policy circles through The Asia Foundation and EDCOM II (the Second Congressional Commission on Education), Laguda co-led the development of a comprehensive Decentralization Framework in the 2025 policy paper "Realizing Shared Governance: Decentralization of Philippine Basic Education."
While it's a collaborative effort with co-authors Gil Aquino, Linda Cangayao, and Ria Tagle, Laguda's background in DepEd governance gives him a central role in shaping its concepts, he's often highlighted as the lead in discussions and related events.
This framework isn't just theoretical; it's rooted in a deep analysis of DepEd's entrenched centralization, drawing on laws such as R.A. No. 9155 (the Governance of Basic Education Act) and R.A. No. 7160 (the Local Government Code), as well as EDCOM II's broader reform agenda.
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐
At its core, the framework tackles the "why" of decentralization: the Philippine education system serves over 28 million learners but remains bogged down by a top-down structure that concentrates decision-making, finances, and oversight at DepEd's Central Office.
This leads to what the paper calls a "culture of control and over-compliance," think endless memos and rigid hierarchies that stifle creativity at the regional, division, and school levels. Laguda and his team point out that this setup creates inefficiencies, such as duplicated roles across offices and an overstretched bureaucracy that can't keep up with diverse local needs, whether in remote islands or urban slums.
For instance, 45% of schools lack permanent principals, and 75% of households are unaware of key tools such as School Improvement Plans (SIPs) and School Governance Councils (SGCs). The result? A learning crisis where centralized policies fail to deliver equitable outcomes, especially in underserved areas.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐: ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฃ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ
The "how" of the framework is practical and phased, emphasizing "deconcentration" within DepEd (shifting powers to field offices) alongside "asymmetric devolution" to Local Government Units (LGUs) and Local School Boards (LSBs), meaning not a one-size-fits-all handover but a tailored approach based on local readiness.
Laguda conceptualizes this through what he dubs the CARAT elements: Capacity, Authority, Resources, Accountability, and Transparency (with some variations noting "Culture" as a factor). It's about aligning responsibilities at every level: Central Office sets standards and monitors; Regional Offices craft localized policies; Division Offices handle implementation and resources; Schools focus on instructional leadership through empowered principals; and LGUs step up through SEF (Special Education Fund) and LSBs for infrastructure and community support.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ๐ผ๐น-๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ (๐ฆ๐๐ )
A standout feature is the reconceptualization of School-Based Management (SBM), which Laguda sees as the frontline of decentralization. Currently, SBM often devolves into paperwork overload without absolute autonomy, teachers are buried in reports, and schools scrape by on inequitable Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) allocations.
The framework calls for reviving SBM grants (discontinued after 2016), tiering MOOE to ensure fairness (e.g., higher floors for remote schools), and reducing prescriptive rules to allow principals to innovate. It also calls for stronger participatory tools, such as SGCs, SIPs, and School Report Cards, to involve parents, communities, and civil society.
๐๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฅ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฝ
Implementation is structured as a phased, DepEd-led process with a clear roadmap. It begins with a preparation phase that outlines milestones, such as legislative adjustments to R.A. No. 9155 or internal policy changes.
The next step involves piloting in high-readiness regions or divisions, testing the deconcentration of programs such as computerization or last-mile schools, and delegating procurement and beneficiary selection downward while the Central Office maintains oversight.
Capacity building is essential: retraining staff through the National Educators Academy of the Philippines (NEAP), fostering cross-level mentoring, and establishing monitoring systems for real-time feedback. For LGUs, this means expanding the use of SEF, harmonizing budgets with DepEd, and broadening LSB membership to include more stakeholders.
๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ
Laguda has described this as a "full-circle moment" in his own reflections, tying back to his DepEd days and stressing that decentralization isn't about losing control but building a system where local actors drive better results.
Fact-checking across sources, including EDCOM II's website and recent discussions, confirms that no significant shifts have occurred since the paper's November 2025 release; it's still positioned as a blueprint for EDCOM II's "Turning Point" reforms through 2035. Recent DepEd moves, like LGU-led classroom construction, echo its spirit, but full adoption would require legislative buy-in and cultural change within the agency.
In essence, Laguda's framework offers a grounded path forward, reminding us that true reform means empowering those closest to the learners.
๐๐ก๐
NB. The title โ2025 National Planning Conferenceโ has been retained despite the activity being held in 2026. The conference was originally scheduled for implementation in 2025; however, it was postponed due to adverse weather conditions. Keeping the original title preserves the integrity of the 2025 planning cycle and maintains alignment with the preparatory documents and communications already issued for that year.
For more information, contact (085) 221-1151, 0961-737-0873, or 0915-808-4734. Website: www.caraga.deped.gov.ph; email: caraga@deped.gov.ph; pau_caraga@deped.gov.ph.
Read related stories at these links: